Arachnological information
https://arages.de/en/journal/arachnology-lettersNentwig W, Blick T, Gloor D, Jäger P & Kropf C
How to deal with destroyed type material? The case of Embrik Strand (Arachnida: Araneae)
Wie geht man mit zerstörtem Typenmaterial um? Der Fall von Embrik Strand (Arachnida: Araneae)
Heft 59
When the museums of Lübeck, Stuttgart, Tübingen and partly of Wiesbaden were destroyed during World War II between 1942 and 1945, also all or parts of their type material were destroyed, among them types from spider species described by Embrik Strand between 1906 and 1917. He did not illustrate type material from 181 species and one subspecies and described them only in an insufficient manner. These species were never recollected during more than 110 years and no additional taxonomically relevant information was published in the arachnological literature. It is impossible to recognize them, so we declare these 181 species here as nomina dubia. Four of these species belong to monotypic genera, two of them to a ditypic genus described by Strand in the context of the mentioned species descriptions. Consequently, without including valid species, the five genera Carteroniella Strand, 1907, Eurypelmella Strand, 1907, Theumella Strand, 1906, Thianella Strand, 1907 and Tmeticides Strand, 1907 are here also declared as nomina dubia. Palystes modificus minor Strand, 1906 is a junior synonym of P. superciliosus L. Koch, 1875 syn. nov.
nomen dubium, scientific description, scientific illustration, spiders